I think it would be much better if we referred to the gravitational pull discrepancy as the problem itself and called "dark matter" just one of the possible explanations.
I think it would be much better if we referred to the gravitational pull discrepancy as the problem itself and called "dark matter" just one of the possible explanations.
The fact that dark matter is specifically unobservable via electromagnetism just makes it funny. Well, a little bit, if you're a cosmologist.
The whole point of the article that we're commenting on is that it might not be matter. The root problem is that the observed doesn't line up with the expected. Is the problem with the observed or with the expected? We don't know. You're assuming the problem is with the observed. This article is saying we can modify our expected values with a tweak to the model.
We should name the phenomenon after the problem, not after one of the not-yet-proved-but-expected-to-be solutions.