Most working people now need one to work or they face termination as loss of livelihood
Stop pretending it's not required. We're not all trust finders.
Most working people now need one to work or they face termination as loss of livelihood
Stop pretending it's not required. We're not all trust finders.
I never claimed it wasn't required, just that what was required was not experimental.
Independently of that, I think there is good reason to doubt the quality of data gathered during this “open beta” of a phase 3 trial. Two people I know are suffering long lasting adverse reactions after being vaccinated. In both cases the doctors do not want to explore the possibility that the effects were caused by the vaccine.
It’s not hard to imagine that this is a pretty common situation. Doctors have had their licenses revoked for questioning the safety of the vaccines.
Isn’t it obvious this taints the data? If doctors feel the need to stop-crime when they see adverse reactions in order to be able to continue in their profession?
Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech) is fully approved for those 16 and over, and has been since late August.
AFAIK, any different liability profile between an EUA and approved product is moot in the case of COVID vaccines, because they are out of both normal liability regimes and standard vaccine liability regimes and covered by the PREP Act pandemic countermeasures regime which does not make a distinction.