Video that discusses her possible biases and the trojan horse suspicion.
Well he certainly is familiar with bias. I'll give you that.
I don't have any opinion about him as a person but as a source of information he isn't reputable and I'd not waste my time listening to him.
That's.. Not coherent. GP didn't ask you to look, you volunteered that you don't want to look.
> someone who isn't a bully and a homophobe
Your explanation of your own comment:
> I don't have any opinion about him as a person […] as a source of information he isn't reputable
I think at some level, you recognize that you’re ignoring a source based on your opinion of him as a person, so you feel the need to claim the opposite.
You’d think if your second paragraph were true, you’d have commented on his failures as a source and not him as a person as the basis of your objection in the first paragraph.