Unlimited Vacation Days Is a Scam
lifehacker.com
lifehacker.com
Fast forward five years and now I have no qualms taking PTO whenever I want. I like unlimited PTO. No one is firing me for taking PTO. I have my own definition of what a reasonable amount of PTO is in a year and I use that definition. If anyone has a problem with how much PTO I take, I'm sure they'll tell me. Personally I prefer being able to interpret the policy in a way that works for me. Better to ask for forgiveness than permission.
In order for unlimited PTO to work you need an incredibly high trust environment which is very hard to create.
1. My manager in particular would never do that, but even if they did:
2. I know how much I contribute relative to my team. If my manager told me I was underperforming - for any stated reason, but especially if I suspected it was for taking "too much" PTO - I'd almost certainly find a new team, because that just ain't so.
To elaborate on 2 a little bit, it's worth pointing out that you're definitely more vulnerable to shitty management tactics like that if you aren't sure of your own market value.
If your main point is that "unlimited PTO" can be a weapon in the hands of a bad manager, I concede that. But my counterpoint to "unlimited PTO is bad" is that, within the bubble world of tech, we as employees have so much power to dictate our working conditions there's very little reason to put up with any such bullshit in the first place. And most employers are aware of this right now.[0]
[0] https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/business/story/2021-07-...
I don’t get it - some would be comfortable and thus would enjoy more PTO
> bad managers can abuse
That’s an issue of bad managers more than PTO policy
- It’s self-serve, so I don’t need approval from anyone to suddenly take a day off for any reason.
- I never have to worry about when to plan trips, as I can work around everyone else’s stringent time off policies.
- I can see my friends and family more frequently.
- I can take mental health days without feeling like I have to prove something to someone.
- You don’t run into weird conversations with your peers about why you were away. It’s normal for people to take PTO.
I don’t think there is any pressure from the company for me to take less PTO. In fact, I’ve experienced pressure from my leads to take more PTO.
Any company which has informal limits on unlimited afk isn’t doing it right. Maybe their limit is 4 weeks, and they’re strict about whether they approve it. Well, they’re lying about the policy, so you could nearly say it’s not even a proper unlimited-afk policy.
In other words, the bad examples of unlimited afk happen when a company doesn’t actually do unlimited afk. They just say they do. So I don’t think that should be treated as a critique of unlimited afk specifically.
That would allow for a week off between Christmas and New Year, two one-week vacations, and some extra days scattered around the year.
What will happen is you end up asking someone else what they take. And you're new, so you don't want to be seen to be taking advantage. Poof, everybody takes minimal vacations, only obviously needed days like when there's an illness or life events.
In the countries I have experience with it’s 20 working days per year, sometimes with extra days given based on time spent with the same employer. Also, some employers give extra days from the start. But, importantly, it can never be less than the labor code specified number.
So, unlimited vacation may be a trick in the sense that people will rarely take days off, but you can’t be cheated out of the law mandated vacation. Social protection isn't that bad, after all.
The others are (per Wikipedia):
* Kiribati
* Marshall Islands
* Micronesia
* Nauru
* Palau
* Tonga
That said, your ability to actually _enforce_ your right to minimum holidays is going be pretty variable.
It's captured perfectly in "17 pieces of flair is the minimum, some people choose to add extra to express themselves"
With work, there's also different degrees of how much vacation one needs and also how much they feel comfortable asking for. A workaholic might be less inclined to take vacation than someone who likes to travel, and a more confident person might be more inclined to book more vacation days than one who isn't as confident.
Let's not generalize and assume everyone is too spineless to ask their boss for vacations they're entitled to.
At the company I'm at, I haven't heard of vacation requests being denied, but I've also only been here for 3 months. I did ask about the policy during the interview process, and they said the CEO has created a culture that encourages people to take the time off they need. They have two "quiet weeks", one between Christmas and New Year's, the other in August, where everyone is forced to take a whole week off, supposedly because they know that otherwise, some people would feel guilty about taking time off. In addition, the first Friday of every month is a "Fresh Air Friday", where they strongly encourage you to walk away from your computer after 1 PM, and regular meetings after 1 PM are not allowed.
Ask me about the policy in a year and I'll tell you how well it's actually been working.
I’m curious to see if policies like this become the norm. Anecdata, but people absolutely seem to be happier when they get time off without having to question it. (I.e. “do I have enough left over for a potential holiday alter this year?”)
The thing I've enjoyed most about "unlimited" holiday though is not the length, but the fact that I don't need to differentiate between holidays and sickness. That may sound like an obvious distinction, but it's not. Sometimes I know that for my own (mental) health I need a day off, but I'm not _sick_, it doesn't need to be a specific day, it could be any day in the next week maybe. Justifying it as a sick day would be tricky if there is a distinction made, and taking it as a holiday is a bit unfair on the employee because it's not really about the holiday. Unlimited time off means there is no distinction and you can just do it without thinking about it.
Another thing that improves our approach is that while we don't technically have a minimum (there are guidelines), if someone leaves they are entitled to 4 weeks paid leave in their last year and we make this up in time/salary to ensure leavers don't lose out. Last time I checked we hadn't actually had to pay anyone as all leavers had taken enough holiday.
It takes a lot of discipline to get right, and so it's still a red flag for me, but it's one that can definitely be overcome and can be a strong positive if the company has the right attitude.
1. At previous jobs I treated the PTO like an asset. When I'd eventually leave the company, that asset would get paid out to me. So I'd be balancing the worth of a week off provided all of the overhead associated (such as coverage plans), with just finding another job in a year and getting a big check for the unused time, and finally taking a real break.
2. It is surprising how much I appreciate simply taking a day off without going into an inane HR system to log '8 hours PTO' and submit for approval or whatever. It makes me feel less like a row on the CFO's cost sheet and more of an autonomous person who's contributions are assumed.
> A study by Namely found that employees with unlimited PTO took an average of 13 vacation days, compared to 15 days for their fixed PTO counterparts. Why would this be?
The article implies that it's from fear of seeming lazy by comparison; there's probably truth to that but also working your life away is simply more cultural in the U.S., and people tend to behave as others do. Which is why we need a better standard for our workers as a country.
Sure enough, some months later, a large portion of us were sold-off/laid-off, and I still had about 80 hours of vacation time accrued prior to the switch, which was a decent chunk of change when it paid out. The people that had been riding the "unlimited" days got diddly.
As a manager, I routinely checked-in with everyone who reported up to me to make sure that people were taking breaks as much as possible. It felt nice!
I understand that at some companies with terrible management, Unlimited PTO policies can be a nightmare, but if you have a good culture, it can be a huge benefit for employees to know that they can take frequent breaks, go on long vacations, and have a nice work/life balance.
I do make an effort to take off some time every month. I also work really hard and produce a lot of solid work, including mentoring/training others and picking up work from people who have left the team/company. I'm not in a senior role.
Work hard, play hard.
But this is also why you will typically use less with unlimited: if you use too little of accrued PTO, the firm will either:
(1) have a policy with an accrual limit, which will encourage you to to use it or lose it, or
(2) have a must-use policy to limit the liability on their books, ehich will force you to use it, or
(3) take steps (possibly including incentives) to get people to reduce large balances, to limit liability on the books.
And, typically, they’ll have policies encouraging managers to approve requests (and give soft encouragement to take vacation) to people whose balances are approaching the point where the other measures would kick in.
With unlimited PTO, you not using it is a pure benefit for the employer with no cost, so they have no (narrow, short-term balance-sheet optimizing) reason to do anything but encourage it. Plus, in limited PTO situations, the fact of the limits themselves is a factor which encourages managers to be flexible with exercising the “business need” discretion they are generally given over approval in both systems—sure, maybe its a moment you really think Bob would be important, but by taking it now, the balance will be exhausted and you’ve got less chance of him even requesting leave for a while, so you can adjust. With unlimited leave, “business need” is the only constraint, so managers have a lot less reason (even before balance sheet concerns) to be flexible on it.
To the extent there is a broader benefit to the firm of employees taking vacation, management that sees it over the clear immediate costs of people getting paid for not working is rarely a reliable thing across all the relevant layers of management in an organization of any scale. Even if the environment is one where unlimited PTO works well today, there is very little guarantee that will be the case tomorrow.
This has a simple fix: have a reasonably high minimum PTO of say 20 or 25 days. That must be a hard minimum as in every employee must take at least that.
Then there is a decent lowest level so if your manager is suddenly the kind of guy that would see PTO as poor performance, then at least no one has to do zero PTO out of fear. When the environment is healthier people can take more PTO, that’s great.
Meanwhile I've been trying to put together a list of companies that do 40+ days' pto and are remote. Hotjar and Todoist are two I've found, but I know there are others. Anyone else have additions?
1) Set your pay so incredibly high that you can accrue enough to retire within a few minutes.
2) Get fired like 15 minutes later when someone figures out what's up and freaks out and manages to frantically do whatever's necessary to get you off the payroll.
3) Retire.
Every employee gets 4wks minimum. Each quarter, if you have not taken or planned (reserved) any PTO, then PTO is automatically scheduled for you.
Then, during your timeoff, your account is locked out. No fake vacations!