Ask HN: Wouldn't federated social network mean disinformation and lawlessness?

Decentralized networks mean more freedom, more speech, and more expression (which are human rights), and I think we should optimize for that over any fears of misuse.

There's already disinformation and lawlessness on centralized networks.

What are you going to do when people remember that they don't need the internet and can just gather in their own homes and have conversations nobody can legally monitor without a warrant?