There's qutebrowser and you can donate directly to the developer but I'm not sure if you'd be comfortable using it.
The major downside is that web extensions (addons) don't work in qutebrowser.
The major downside is that web extensions (addons) don't work in qutebrowser.
The guy who contacted me didn't understand "if you won't offer a SOCKS or HTTP proxy, even if I wanted to, it's not possible".
Naturally I would be anything but comfortable with such a "partnership" (the only thing I'm exploring is getting money from search engines for qutebrowser users' searches).
Nevermind that it'd also be a bad idea from a monitary perspective, given that I'd probably lose more in donations that I'd gain from such a thing.
Oh I like this. It's subtle in a way that flies under the radar but still blesses someone's little heart effectively.
On a side note: I love qutebrowser, even as someone who doesn't prefer Vim or Vim keybindings in things. I like it because it is slim up top, and does what you tell it to and not a stitch more. If it got paywalled tomorrow, but everything else remained the same and open, I could see paying 10 bucks a month for it.
One thing I would perhaps consider is having more "proper" releases for macOS and Windows (with things like code signing, automatic updates, etc. - perhaps even via the Windows and macOS stores) for a small one-time fee. But that's mainly because supporting those platforms properly costs me additional money (and additional time).
edit: I am not a windows or mac user, I just like the thing you make.