A blank wall can show how many people are in a room and what they’re doing
scientificamerican.com
scientificamerican.com
Because they qualify this is for blank walls both in the abstract and in the video, I’d first assume it’s possible they tried it and ran into substantial issues - even though it might logically seem easy. Maybe it will take a bit more math or engineering to handle non-blank walls, and it’s being saved for the next paper. Since non-blank walls will increase the dimensionality (and training time) of the problem, and likely come with reduced effectiveness in some cases, and since a result with blank walls is good enough for publication, maybe this is just a first step?
The initial state of the wall (before people are introduced) should be known.
With a solid color wall you can find shadows of people, objects, etc.
But with a wall with objects on it, you need an image of it before the room was filled, in order to interpret the shadows. (From a machine standpoint. As humans we can process out the art or whatever is on the wall)
I still don't understand how they're able to get a detectable optical signal through brick and concrete walls. It'd be nice if they actually measured the transmissibility of said walls in the paper.