Hacker News Reader

Hacker News

Comment by lapetitejort | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

lapetitejort

According to the story, each book has:

* 410 pages

* 40 lines per page

* 80 characters per line

* Not included: The characters on the front cover, maybe 15 on average?

There are 25 symbols.

So there are 25^(410*40*80) possible books, which comes out to ~10^1834097 books. Sufficed to say, the library could hold numerous universes.

View on HN

For point of comparison, the maximal amount of information we could fit into a sphere the size of the observable universe is ~10^124 bits.

Someone should offer a public Library of Babel API that streams these books so folks don't need to store them individually.

That's most likely an upper limit, as random character strings are not necessarily language.

If you read the story you will see that most books present the appearance of random strings of characters.

If the sets of integers and reals is anything to go by, an infinitesimal portion of the books would include something that's actually legible, but perhaps the books could be sorted so those containing the most sensible arrangements of letters were kept nearby: don't bother looking at those noisy tomes of high entropy.

But perhaps the noise is just a language you haven’t recognized? Perhaps the noise contains True information when decoded using a scheme described in one of the other books?

O very true... you might start trying out one book as an XOR key to another. Of course, the result of decryption will already be sitting on the next shelf over :-)

Infinitesimal is a bit off, here. It's a very, very small but definitely finite proportion of books that'd be legible by humans in a human language.

You don't even need the full set of integers to catalogue the library, let alone the reals.

What I was trying to say was, since there are an infinite number of real numbers between each pair of integers, there would be a similarly infinite number of garbage text between each pair of legible texts.

Even though there are an infinite number of integers, there are an even more infinite number of reals, rendering the proportion of (integers)/(reals) to be near 0.

I'd say every set of whatever is a language. not the opposite tho

On the contrary, a random character string is meaningful in some conceivable language.

All you need is a reference to the book that describes the grammar of that language.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com