Active noise cancellation is not for me
veronneau.org
veronneau.org
Quieter-but-still-annoying volume levels, such as overflying aircraft or loud traffic heard through closed windows, are typically reduced to the point where they're unnoticeable.
Also, pro-parenting tip: ANC earbuds without even playing anything are effectively a "turn down the volume" button on your kids screaming!
Uh-oh...
> ANC earbuds without even playing anything are effectively a "turn down the volume" button on your kids screaming!
That is more of a "non-parenting tip", really. The solution to screaming children is to tell them to tone it down a bit, no to isolate yourself from them. That way they not only learn something but also interact with you instead of considering you to be part of the furniture.
Source: my two daughters who can be quite noisy at times. Sometimes this is fine but they know to tone it down when they're in company of others.
Then I remodeled my kitchen with a friend who had a new pair of AirPod Pros. While we were sawing countless plywood boards, I had foam in my ears, he listened to podcasts; while we were sanding for hours, he listened to music. Etc.
Now I see ANC earbuds less as a comfort thing than a tool: a flexible and pocketable solution to all kinds of things that come up (ambulances, jackhammers, overhead trains). Swiss Army knives for ears.
For a noisy work environment like that, I would strongly recommend you get real hearing protection with built-in headphones. I suggested Etymotic in-ear headphones elsewhere, but there are also ones that are based on over-the-ear hearing protection like is more commonly used on construction sites.
https://ehs.umass.edu/sites/default/files/Noise-Cancelling%2...
The only generally accepted way in which they might protect your hearing is by reducing the urge to crank the volume on your music too high in an effort to drown out environmental noise.
The difference matters. AirPods and similar devices are engineered to reduce the loudness of the sound. But hearing damage is caused by intensity, which is not the same thing. One is about how the sound is perceived, and the other is about the amount of energy being carried by the sound waves. It is possible to reduce a noise's loudness without reducing its intensity.
The principle of ANC is straightforward and the textbook definition doesn't involve any psychoacoustic tricks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_noise_control. You haven't given any reason to think AirPods are doing something fundamentally different.
I didn't ask to dig any deeper. I don't need to understand every grotty little detail of the reasoning behind my doctor's advice. I trust her to know what she's talking about when the subject is her core area of expertise.
What I do know is that it seems plausible to me. The perception of loudness is a product of a fairly complex system that involves both neural filters and sensing organs that work a very specific way, and a lot of that happens on the opposite side of the spot where the actual damage occurs in noise-induced hearing loss. I would guess that the problem is that any failure in the ANC to get the phase just right results in a waveform that's been modified such that it reduces the noise's detectability by the cochlea much more than it reduces the actual energy being carried?
That said, I would suggest you're trying to put the burden of proof on the wrong proposition. Given that AirPods are not being sold as hearing protection, and have not been tested by the EPA, one would think that we the default hypothesis should be that they are not adequate hearing protection. Especially since we're talking about people's health here. So perhaps you can come up with a study demonstrating that consumer-grade ANC such as AirPods (we have to assume that the device in the paper you linked above may not function comparably to popular consumer devices, so the study's findings may not be relevant here) can be safely used as protection from occupational noise?
I’m with the author on this, ANC is too fatiguing to my ears to use. Passive noise reduction is much better.
My issue is that most of the loud noises I am trying to block out are non-repeating. ANC is great for rhythmic sounds, but terrible for everything else. A blacksmith friend of mine hates ANC.
My issue now is that the newer Samsung buds all are open, to allow for better ANC. This rules them out for my use case.
This is so noticeable to me (though I don't get headaches). Does everyone else who uses ANC headsets/earbuds not notice? Or they notice and it doesn't bother them?
The worst problem I have is a bit of neck pain after waking up when sleeping with them on all night long!
edited for correcting my English.
Totally hear how it could also be detrimental for other people but for me its been amazing. Also at work, drones out all other noise pretty much completely except loud voices.
Only downside is that whenever I am on a call with them or someone talks to me am obviously yelling in response :P
Snobby audiophile reviews should be done mid flight, naturally they will still confirm the massive difference in audio fidelity between Rhodium and Gold connectors.
This is the same approach used by live musicians to hear themselves over concert volume speaker arrays, well sealed IEMs attenuate background noise passively extremely well.
ref. https://www.asoundeffect.com/how-to-protect-your-hearing/
Rememeber, ANC is blasting the equivalent energy of your outside environment into your ears, but ideally in an inverted phase. I say ideally, because it’s based off a median set of ears (much like how a lot of stereo mixing does). The problem comes since if your ears are far from that median, you may be getting increased sound pressure due to interference in the wrong direction.
One of the first applications for ANC headphones was in military headsets - specifically designed to reduce the risk of hearing damage/loss to crews operating in very loud environments (such as the M1 Abrams Tank!)
There was a whole discussion in the past about how Dolby Atmos doesn’t work for some people, for the exact same reason.
The purpose of my comment is to say “If ANC is fatiguing your ears, stop using it”. It’s a sign of problems; of ANC not working properly for you.
"Some people" is a set which the author identifies himself as, as well as others in this thread.
I tried the QuietOn Sleep, but they didn't seem any better than foam earplugs (and possibly a scam - i.e. lacking any ANC at all).
Anyone knows about any such things?
ANC is useful sometimes, but I'd love the ability to default it to off on these headphones...
Glad I'm not alone!
So ANC is great for removing car noise? I don't really need it, prefer to hear the oncoming traffic.
Oh they help for aeroplane engine hum? Well, it's not really bothering me. Quite the opposite, helping me fall asleep more easily and cover other, more annoying noises in the plane.
Now, if some manufacturer could produce a comfortable headphones that block human speech and laughter, and more importantly toddler noises, I would be first in queue to buy them.
Also, if by hearing the oncoming traffic you mean that you've tried ANC headphones while driving: please don't wear any sort of headphones when operating a vehicle. Music is already distracting, cutting off the world on top of that is even worse. And also likely to be illegal. Even if not specifically called out in law, there's a good chance it will be considered distracted driving.
I don't drive. I meant avoiding being hit by a car because of the tire noise being cancelled.
Does this mean there is a tonne of sub-sonic noise that we don't conciously hear but we do notice when it is taken away by noise cancelling or is it just the headphones reducing the pressure on the eardrum so it sounds quieter?
This is especially true if you live in a city. You often don't notice noise pollution but it has very significant long-term impacts on human health.
yep, not unlike background radiation.
This is a simple way to divide the expertise between two firms who specialize in different things. Integrating noise-cancelling electronics into the product itself is not this simple. Bell Helmets doesn't employ firmware engineers.
ANC = Active Noise Cancelation
Noise is rather objective here...
Its noises like droning sounds, like a machine or background noises like traffic or inside a train and airplane.
Fortunately for me, I'm not one of them. I got some lower-end Sennheisers on a lark a while back, and found them AMAZING for use on planes. You don't realize how draining the plane's white noise is until it goes away, let me tell you. It was like a breath of fresh air.
I had, for years, poo-pooed the idea of ANC vs. high-end in-ear monitor type headphones based on an imperfect understanding of how to measure sound isolation; I was just WRONG.
I have a bit of a headphone acquisition problem, I admit. While I still have those Sennheisers, I also have the AirPods Pro (which are great for many things, but not really sufficient for airplane duty -- OTOH, they completely mask the noise of my bicycle trainer) and the AirPods Max (which are better than the Sennheisers in every way).
The Max are expensive, but sound far better than any headphone I have except MAYBE the $400 wired pair of Sennheisers I have in my office. They're in another league. The white noise is gone, but so is most conversation around you, or other incidental noises, or whatever. Pre-COVID, I worked in hotel lobbies and coffeeshops doing very focussed work without distraction, which is pretty great.
I'll also say this, which I found kind of hilarious. I recently bought some of those bone-conduction headphones (AfterShockz) for use when gravel cycing (no cars to worry about there). They don't even go in your ears; they sit your skull just outside the ear canal, and work pretty darn well. Their WHOLE REASON TO EXIST is that they DO NOT block external sounds, so they're safer to wear when running or cycling or whatever.
However, so that you can still use them in other contexts where you might want to block out sounds, they ship with some earplugs. Ha!