I'd call that a "median comment."

I feel it's legitimate to criticize the title for what the title is, regardless of the content of the article.

In this case, it was bad enough I refuse to read the article.

Are you saying I would find the article to use "median" appropriately, if I bothered to check?

I mean, the title is often the most important part of a post. It's a boiled down version of what the creator wants to present to the world. In this case, it's a very badly boiled down idea.