Hacker News Reader

A decade ago I was with an ISP who took a stand for "Google should pay us for the priviledge of having our users watch YouTube". I believe I wasn't the only one who decided that's the last straw and moved to an ISP that wasn't rejecting peering based on greed.

View on HN

Sounds like an ISP in a monopolistic situation.

When there are alternatives, ISPs would bend over backwards for what customers want.

That are not colluding like a cartel, of course.

Thankfully that was a market with good competition. They might have hoped to capitalise on some of that anti-American, anti-BigTech sentiment. But everyone I knew who used them was pissed at these shenanigans. Hilariously enough, I switched to a former governmental monopoly.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com