> just one person made a dumb error and it blew up their site
yeah, the dumb error they made was "using DNSSEC"
yeah, the dumb error they made was "using DNSSEC"
But, some governments are requiring DNSSEC, which regardless of its usefulness, puts companies that want those contracts in a bit of a bind.
Perhaps it would make sense to split domains such that DNSSEC guarded ones would not negatively impact ones that do not have DNSSEC.
The important top-line thing to know here is that virtually all tech companies eschew DNSSEC (you can verify that for yourself with `host -t ds stripe.com`; substitute any other company for Stripe.
DNSSEC-quarantine TLDs are a good idea.
> M-08-23, Securing the Federal Government's Domain Name System Infrastructure (August 22, 2008)
> OMB is rescinding memorandum M-08-23, which provides additional guidance on the Domain Name System (DNS), specifically focusing on new security protections for the Federal DNS. The requirements in this memorandum are outdated; agencies already should have implemented these security protections.