You're indeed a horrible person, but at least an honest one. Seeing planetary scale habitat destruction and the wiping out of the complex web of life that took hundreds of millions of years to evolve, all in a single century, really is quite a win indeed.
Besides individual extinctions, most of the 2 millions or so other species are in deep decline. The IUCN's most positive status for a species is "least concern", really quite telling.
You'd have somewhat of point if a reasonable quality of life would only be possible at the direct expense of other species and habitats, which is not the case.
We sacrifice the world's jungles and its massively complex and old wildlife systems for palm oil. Which is absolutely not an essential requirement for human life at all.
Most other forests are sacrificed to plant crops. Not for us, to feed cattle. So that we can eat beef, the least efficient food. There are alternative meats, less eating of meat, or none at all.
We scrape the ocean floors, use electricity or even dynamite to fish in such a way that collateral damage is off the charts.
We spread our filth (plastics) across the world, it's now found at the poles and even at the bottom of the deepest oceans.
We do trophy hunting on already rare animals for superstition or a quick profit.
None of the above things are required for us to have a reasonable or good quality of life. They are short-sighted, careless and aggressive profit optimizations with disastrous and irreversible consequences. And even if you still don't care, those profits won't end up in the workers pocket or in yours.
No, wildlife habitats do not have to be stripped bare or otherwise we'd go hungry. It's bullshit.