Australia has lost one-third of its koalas in the past three years
reuters.com
reuters.com
Koalas are adorable and beloved. Imagine how many less obvious (or "gross") species in similar situations don't get articles written about them. That koala populations can plummet this far should be a clarion call about the state of things.
Mirror: https://archive.is/cZkdM
They are an evolutionary dead end and actually nasty, nasty creatures.
From time to time when I was a kid my parents and relatives used to take me to places where one could cuddle them and I can tell you they're not very cuddly at all.
We tend to anthropomorphize cute animals with big eyes and I reckon that's not good for conservation overall as the ugly get less attention. Moreover, how animals appear isn't a good indicator of their nature. Another well-known example is the loris, it looks really cute but it's a very bad idea to pick one up as you'll get jabbed by its poisoned barb.
Best thing to do is to just look and leave them be. Koalas aren't the only animals suffering habitat loss, many are and it's a huge problem.
+1. Would not cuddle. Australia's minister of tourism one famously proclaimed that the koala is "flea-ridden, it piddles on you, it stinks and it scratches."[4]
Fun Fact: The eucalyptus that Koalas eat is a narcotic and the Koalas spend most of their lives in a drugged out stuppor[2]. Baby Koalas eat their mother's feces[1]. They sleep 18 hours a day. They have a strong musky odor. They also suffer from Chlamydia[3] and many parasites. They are nature's hippies.
More seriously, all of these are evolved traits. E.g. the feces is eaten to acquire the microbes necessary to breakdown the Eucalyptus leaf. The 18 hours of sleeping is because those leaves don't have a lot of caloric content. Rather than being an evolutionary dead end in the traditional sense, their biggest problem is loss of habitat, road accidents, and encounters with dogs. I prefer the world with koalas rather than the world without, but would not cuddle or touch them them.
[1] https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/controversial-science-heal...
[2] https://adventuressetravels.wordpress.com/2013/02/08/drug-ad...
[3] https://www.livescience.com/62517-how-koalas-get-chlamydia.h...
[4] https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1983/05/22/f...
"Yea, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man."
Magpies are much worse. I don't know anyone who hasn't been swooped by one.
Sure, if you know exactly where they are on a regular route you might be able to avoid them by taking a different route.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-09/qld-baby-dies-after-m...
"People injure themselves panicking around Australian Magpies, far more than anything Magpies directly do." sounds just like victim-blaming.
In comparison, koalas just stay in their trees when you walk past.
Of course I'm generalising because the majority of magpies don't swoop and I like hearing their songs. But there are plenty of overly aggressive magpies that do real harm.
They're not the only ones.
I survived unscathed and asthma fee - a good test of the 'too much hygiene hypothesis' methinks. ;-)
"This is it, this is a countdown to extinction"
Wonder what would be also the effects of this on them and wildlife in general.When I have seen Koalas in the wild they seemed very apathetic- saw one stay at the very top of a blue-gum (which famously can shed huge pieces without much warning) even during a storm.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-30/killing-koalas-90-yea...
https://www.dropbox.com/s/12v1undbbi6x9ez/AKFestimates_2021....
Sadly that won’t work. Koalas hardly make a dent in the consumption of eucalyptus trees. And on top of that, mature Eucalyptus leaves are extremely dry, so koalas will only eat the youngest shoots. So if they had any impact on the trees, it would be making them more flammable, not less.
We are next.
But not to worry, they'll be in very good company. The predatory ecosystem exploitation we've been living and breathing for quite some time now has put incredible strains on our whole life support system. Biological systems are amazingly resilient and this resilience has hidden much of the damage that has accumulated.
Unfortunately this has just made us disregard many of the warning signs that are flashing in front of our eyes. Food webs are collapsing, ecosystems get more and more fragmented and with increased fragmentation, failure in one part cannot be compensated for in another part.
Koalas are cute, so they get the publicity. That's good I guess. But let's not pretend that it's only koalas.
It's everything.
Guess some people's really don't like animals and the urge to show that is strong.
Stating a simple fact with no sources and no discussion is not a good HN comment. Ignoring your first sentence, your comment is really good.
Their answer was "Koalas have chlamydia."
How does this not add to the discussion? And this doesn't need a source, that fact is well understood but not obvious to everyone reading this thread.
Wonderful recreation activity, I would venture!