Is that really the side you want to root for?
Freedom of speech - not only as a legal value but an ethical one - is the only basis on which we can avoid letting a dominant voice shut out unloved truths.
If you want me to ask a similarly misleading line of questioning based only on trying to draw false equivalence from principles: Currently Youtube is self-censoring porn. Is the side of "youtube should become a porn site" really the side you want to root for?
> False equivalence is a logical fallacy in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed or false reasoning.
Are you suggesting Youtube, a media company, and Hollywood, a collection of media companies, are somehow not comparable?