Uh... did I get something wrong here? A correction or something would be nice.
Uh... did I get something wrong here? A correction or something would be nice.
"The tool is very effective, a 17-seconds attack from a single machine resulting in a 42-minute outage on Pastebin yesterday. As expected, the Pastebin admins weren't very happy with their platform being used for such tests and tweeted 'Please do not test your software on us again.'"
"The effectiveness of RefRef is due to the fact that it exploits a vulnerability in a widespread SQL service. The flaw is apparently known but not widely patched yet. The tool's creators don't expect their attacks to work on a high-profile target more than a couple of times before being blocked, but they don't believe organizations will rush to patch this flaw en masse before being hit."
http://www.thehackernews.com/2011/07/refref-denial-of-servic...
first of all, there's no javascript "engine" on most websites. and every major vendor of SQL databases has it's own, so good luck in finding a vulnerability that works with MSSQL/Oracle/Mysql/Postgresql.
also, even if you manage to store a .js file in a temp directory (which would be handled by the web server, btw. nothing to do with sql/js) it's usually a very locked down directory (you can't even execute from /tmp by default in most GNU/Linux servers)
even so, you would still need to execute that .js file (and how? most servers can't run javascript)
I'm not saying this tool doesn't exist, but I'm pretty sure that's not how it works
if this is in fact anonymous. i'm not convinced, too big a target for them to have so little fanfare/flair.