Hacker News Reader

Comment by lom | Hacker News Reader

Does this imply killing the opponent is a viable strategy in chess?

Not quite. There is also a "rules infraction" where failure to adhere to the laws of chess OR the event regulations can cause you to lose.

Murdering your opponent will almost definitely be considered a rule infraction.

Although there might be some edge cases if the murderer was an absolute ruler of the current country. Or maybe if you happened to kill your opponent in self defense somehow.

> Although there might be some edge cases if the murderer was an absolute ruler of the current country.

You mean like King Canute of Denmark, England, and Norway? [0]

[0] https://wegochess.com/complete-timeline-of-every-chess-relat...

Technically yes, but it is likely not a lawful defense to murder.

Expanding slightly to say, “…not a lawful defense to murder in the jurisdictions of which I am aware.” :)

Never accept an invitation to play chess in the Idaho section of Yellowstone.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zone_of_Death_(Yellowstone)

I surmise also to exercise caution when considering en passant in some but not all american correctional facilities. And certainly don't pronounce it with a heavy french accent if you must, as it might arouse suspicion, even if your immediate opponent seems reasonable. If you do attempt this and violence seems imminent, try saying you were just kidding and gently restore the pieces to their original position.

Could it be possible to exploit differences in how death is defined? What if one were to stop the heart of the opponent, and then immediately resuscitate them?

Death' Gambit

You sacricifive your next dozen or so free years for the victory.

Or does it mean you could win a game of chess against Death itself on a technicality?

Deep Blue vs Kasparov could have taken a very different turn.

Pyric victory - technically you won but the resources you have to sacrifice (your imminent loss of freedom while in prison) make it not worth while.

It would certainly get your name in the history books and secure a legacy of infamy.

A high ego grandmaster on the decline may decide loss of the remainder of their freedom in life is worth the sacrifice.

You have to be in a Stronger passion before your opponent died.

I meant “you would have to be in a stronger position upon the death of your opponent for the match to be adjudicated in your favor”

You'd assume the other person would have it decided against them for a rules infraction first.

Feel like you'd lose by "rules infraction"

Reply on news.ycombinator.com