Can someone better trained here try and analyze this paper?
Can someone better trained here try and analyze this paper?
In this case the evidence is particularly weak as even the paper notes almost every attempt at retrospective randomization or control makes the association basically disappear.
From the paper: "It is difficult to provide evidence of causality in observational research, but triangulation of evidence from alternative study designs and across different research settings has been identified as a promising avenue ... Among current older drinkers, the current study failed to find a consistent relationship between alcohol use and dementia across different contexts, some of which are likely to be subject to quite different confounding structures Meanwhile, Mendelian randomisation studies to date have generally failed to demonstrate a causal relationship between alcohol use and dementia, except perhaps with respect to age of onset for dementia. While there are limitations associated with the current study, as well as the studies based on Mendelian randomisation, strong evidence for the causal link between alcohol use and dementia remains elusive."
https://www.alcoholproblemsandsolutions.org/drinkers-live-lo...
Another possibility is that healthier people tend to drink, though overall health is usually controlled for in studies like these.
There were those studies that showed moderate alcohol use improved health and only heavy drinkers saw detrimental health effects. The problem was that "no drinking" group included people that weren't drinking because of poor health. Later studies compared drinking vs. a "no drinking" sample of people that drank around two glasses of wine per year. The improved health effects completely disappeared. The more you drink, the worse it is for your health.
So this study is like that in using a potentially unhealthy comparison group. They try to offset that a little by also throwing in people that quit drinking. But it is likely that some people quit drinking because of health problems. So I'd guess that this study has the same problem with an unhealthy comparison group. The study probably can't tell you what the actual relationship between alcohol use and dementia with any authority.
They've corrected for this. From the abstract:
> Adjusting for additional demographic and clinical covariates, and accounting for competing risk of death, did not substantially affect results.
There is no way to study this issue, and many similar in nutrition, but with observational data.