We're not discussing human contact, we're discussing video calls.
> I think it’s a little unfair to suggest that this is some kind of idiosyncratic preference of the original poster.
So pointing out that people differ is "a little unfair" but asserting liking video calls is a universal human requirement and enjoyment is fine?
> It’s a basic human need.
History is full of people who happily did without.
>> Also, human contact and informal communication make life and working more enjoyable.
>To you.
I think the vast majority of people would prefer having social contact via video calls to the alternative of having no social contact or having it only via text chat - yes. But I was not talking specifically about video calls.
I believe that too, but for me at least, video chat is for chitchat and banter and text chat for everything, including substance. This is the same for in person; I enjoy going with clients and colleagues to coffeeshops and bars, but we don't get much done in either (in bar, if with techies, actually more than you would think) but it is nice for the human contact.
(Talking work context here if that was not clear)
Cursory evidence - namely, your up-versus-down-votes on this and the GP comment (both currently gray) - suggests that said majority is not really all that vast.
>> Also, human contact and informal communication make life and working more enjoyable.
>To you.
Present the second statement to anyone outside a certain subset of HN readers and they would just sigh and shake their heads. But on HN we can actually have lengthy debates about whether or not humans are indeed social animals!
The votes are pretty even, incidentally. My comments have been alternately positive and negative.