Why Has BlackBerry Been Blamed for the London Riots?
wired.com
wired.com
> Why Has BlackBerry Been Blamed for the London Riots?
Link-bait/troll headline? Check. [AFAICS nobody is "blaming" BlackBerry/RIM. All media outlets are merely reporting that BBM has been widely used to plan some of these riots.] > BlackBerry has been under pressure to respond.
Unfounded claims? Check. [Have they been "under pressure"? Not really, they've stepped up voluntarily to assist the authorities.] > Widespread calls to block BBM [...]
Hyperbolic extrapolation from useless data point? Check. [The link in the article within that text leads to a website with a single user-submitted post, with 2 (two!) comments - hardly widespread.]And with that done.
What was vaguely puzzling me were the references to blackberries in many stories, this article actually explains it. So the title actually does what it says on the tin even if it is a bit over-egged.
I didn't realise that BBMs are free, can be sent to all contacts and encrypted. I did already kind of know blackberries were popular with teenagers. Add those three facts together and it's suddenly obvious why blackberries keep getting mentioned.
The article takes a surprisingly pro-police view, that it's good of RIM to cooperate with the police to help arrest its customers. Wired had a more pro-privacy view on electronic communication in the Cairo riots.
See also: http://www.zdnet.co.uk/blogs/500-words-into-the-future-10014...
Cause it`s black?