> It kind of ruined it for me to have suggestions like this that were totally impractical with 1920s technology.
This text is not about what could or couldn't be done 100 years ago. It is about today.
This text is not about what could or couldn't be done 100 years ago. It is about today.
This makes the more timeless properties interesting, perhaps.
For example, those who own the tools of production can enter to grab for the large share of the market that can do nothing but not go away until all are free or all are dead.
It's less that this was impractical in 1920s, it's more that each period has the monopolies of its time.