The predecessor to Google Earth was clumsy, yet powerful
vice.com
vice.com
At the time I thought it was one of the most spectacular pieces of software I'd ever seen. Google hasn't changed that.
Funny story: Back then I was running keyhole with my son who was about five years old. Naturally you want to fly in over your house, so we did that. He saw the house and said "Dad, go run outside!"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorgon_Stare
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01792-5
Tldr; The 1998 movie "Enemy of the State" had a fancy eye-in-the-sky drone that inspired military drone surveillance tech developed through DARPA funding and deployed in various systems. One such is known as Gorgon Stare, used on Reaper drones.
I had to go to a special closet and print maps from there as it was only installed on one machine.
Some of those layers were updated every 12 or 24 hours, so you could get near-realtime views of stuff like forest fires and crop growth, which are easily visible using specific spectral bands which are imaged by the satellites.
And clouds, of course, updated every few minutes.
Then the project changed directions and it's more of an SDK meant to be baked into other software; the old interface with all its wonder and depth seems to be gone.
Here's what it was like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rfxy7mn7mw
DEC Alpha was the first readily available 64 bit architecture for micro/mini computer sizes. Terraserver was in part a demo of how powerful that was. So was Altavista, the first really successful Web search engine. It started as a DEC research demo program.
Lots of detail on the architecture, in a paper with Jim Gray as a co-author:
https://jimgray.azurewebsites.net/papers/msr_tr_99_29_terras...
One of the hottest applications on the Internet of the time, and they hosted it on 8 servers!
Mind you as children we were perfectly able to fill in the blanks. Yet, the latest version with its highly variable and dynamic weather systems, with spectacular lighting, has really hit the mark for me.
It too uses Microsoft's storage to access data impossible to contain locally in entirety, be it Azure based this time. It would be interesting to learn more about this transition, if related.
I'm not sure who the customer was. I just saw the prototype and wasn't involved with that project. At the time, imagery analysts usually used big photographs and magnifying glasses, as they'd been doing since WWII. This was the beginning of computerizing that process.
So this was being done, expensively, decades before it became a consumer product.
(DoD R&D was like that back then - very expensive one-off designs to solve specific hard problems. This was before "commercial off the shelf technology" overtook the DoD one-offs.)
interesting story however
Which resulted in NRO getting flak from Congress over the rather large building complex they built out by Dulles Airport.
[1] https://www.nro.gov/History-and-Studies/50th-Anniversary-Arc...
I'm sure this will get the clickbait headlines and comments around google "stealing" someone's idea.
To at least a bit ahead of things
They did "terravision" which never went that far in 1994?
They sued claiming their tech was stolen in 2014 (20 years later).
Patent was re-issued twice, so they filed in 1996, then did a re-issue in 2010, then had to do another re-issue in 2013.
The claims are things like
The method of pictorial representation in claim 2, further including determining the coordinates of the data in a new coordinate system
The claims they were accused of violating were found to be invalid. This went to jury trial.
Patents are great, but the more I read software patents, maybe they should be limited to something like 6 years.
To be clear - I think it IS possible that their stuff was "stolen" - in the sense that a number of people probably have had ideas of maps in computers, I know I had an old multi-cd encyclopedia that I think actually had a cool spinning globe which was cutting edge back in day. Their zoom in piece looks like the most unique (sets of more detailed tiles).
I'm not sure when level of detail methods came out really, I know in gaming they were around for a while and there was a terrain generator as well that made great terrain that had some level of detail stuff. Perhaps this was in fact novel?
Mipmaps were invented in 1983.
Keyhole/Earth used "Clipmaps", invented mid-90s. Clipmaps solved the problem of how to fit gigantic mipmapped textures into memory. Basically, you can keep the lowest LODs in memory always (the zoomed out views), and then Clipmaps show an efficient way for storing the higher resolution as needed.
As an aside, RIP the wonderful people behind both these techniques. Lance Williams passed a few years ago, and Michael Jones just a few months ago. Both were kind, humble, and generous geniuses.
This makes it sound like there's some big mystery here. Is it really surprising that a free tool you could download in the 2000s took off where a commercial CD-ROM product from the mid 90s did not? How many people in 1994 would even have machines that could support such a visualization?
And that their logs clearly showed that the first thing anyone looked at was where they lived, where they shopped and other things near them.
So my interpretation was that Microsoft back then were so focused on showing off their SQL server that they didn't even understand the treasure of personal data they had in their hand.
1. https://www.vice.com/en/article/8q89q4/microsofts-terraserve...
Art + COM build something awesome, way ahead of their time. Did Google steal it? A US Jury court sayed no ... I mean even Apple won in the first instance about their black rectangle patent (it took the second to rectify that). People here seem to forget that courts are not about justice, they are midigators.
Was google so inspired by it that they have the same setup (with the same interactions) in their headquarter ? Yes.
Shouldn't our society value more people who build awesome stuff?
The author was one of the founders[1] of Keyhole and stayed on when the company was bought by google.
[1] This might technically be wrong, but he was working for them from almost day one.
As far as Google earth goes, I remember using nasa world wind before I had ever heard of Google earth. At the time that earth came out, nasa had the leg up.
I found Google Earth in VR hard to use. Maybe a more direct interface like this would have been better.
One of my favorite coincidences is how the mapping startup has the same name as NRO’s series of orbital surveillance platforms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KH-11_Kennen
This is also where the “K” in “KML” comes from (Keyhole Markup Language)
This company didn't have a claim on the idea of 3D visualization of the planet.
This technology was developed inside the world's leading computer graphics company, where people spent 24/7 thinking about how to render 3D graphics and textures better, faster, at higher resolutions. And Keyhole was merely a 3d app that happened to be showing the planet. The other company did not have a valid claim against that.