We need to start setting the expectation of transparency for some small subset of info to get further transparency. Change takes time, as much as we’d like it to drastically improve overnight for real life and death situations like medical prices.
The price you charge for the bread might change, but the cost is the same regardless of who is purchasing it. There's a difference between varying costs of an item based on accounting methods, versus varying costs of an item due to who is buying it. There seems to be huge disconnect here between people working in healthcare, and pretty much everyone else.
Heck, sounds like there could be a Civil Rights Act case, if prices impact people differently based on race or sex or other protected class.
You should absolutely be testifying before Congress, not before HN.
Why shouldn't it be? How hard is it for a hospital to project their annual aspirin/paracetamol/? usage and budget for it?
Now try it at a rural critical access hospital for rattlesnake antivenom with a short shelf life, so it usually expires unused. They are required by law to stock it or they cannot have their emergency room open. Estimate the revenue generated from treating the one patient who needs it every other year, and by the way, you have 9 contracted payers with different rates and you don't know which one, if any, the patient will have. Rinse and repeat for every other drug required to provide "critical care". Maybe layer on infusion of exotic chemotherapy drugs or monoclonal antibodies to treat a new pandemic virus.
It's not easy.
Do the same sort of thing for all other short-half-life things that you must keep on hand.
It doesn’t have to be hard. I get that it is complicated right now, but let’s focus on the idea that simplifying it would help everyone.
https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Dow...