Germany Wants to Force Gab to Censor, It’s Not Happening
news.gab.com
news.gab.com
Well spoken
This is the minimum standard the US uses when overseas companies provide services to US citizens (including those not even in the US)...
Other places take differebt approaches to freedom of speech. They're not wrong, they're just different.
I'd also say, if you're making a profit youre a commercial entity so maybe you should abide by (hypothetical) chinese law. If you're engaged in legitimate free speech (etc) activities, be a non profit and so wriggle out of my definition above :). But you can't have the best of both worlds, at least not in my opinion...
Let me ask you though: would you be happy for a foreign site to provide services illegal in the US to US residents and say "well thats life?". If there were a country that permitted CP would it be "their country, their rules?" even if it was having an impact domestically? The US is very aggressive about going after people abroad how brake US law, even ones that aren't in the US (Assange, Kim Dotcom, etc). Why shouldn't Germany have the same right?
I'd like a one-size fits all approach, or for one country to be absolutely and undeniably correct in their exact legislation of free speech. But no one is. Until then, it's not unreasonable for otherwise reasonable, democratic, countries to say "what you put on the web for everyone, us everyone's concern".
This is always the issue with free speech sadly.