Hacker News Reader

Comment by josephcsible | Hacker News Reader

Are you really suggesting that you want everyone with different political beliefs than yourself to all die?

No. That's not what the letters say there. Even here you try straw man arguments. I was talking about science deniers. And about the world needing less of them instead of less people in general.

Actually reading again, sounds like you exacly know who in your country are science deniers.

He’s one of the good people who can tell us the right way to do things. Never mind the 150k vaccine deaths.

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." -- Hitchens's razor

Now apply that to long term vaccine safety.

Ooh hitchens is fun when his logic goes against theistic religion. Not so enjoyed when it works against the modern religion of scientism.

Compare long term vaccine safety to long-lasting after-effects of covid-19.

How? There’s no data

How did they miss the increased mortality during he vaccine testing period? Sample size too small for representative casualties, or organized cover up?

150k vaccine deaths? Source please.

I added a source but hacker news isn’t fond of analysis or thinking in regards to political issues; it was flagged.

I saw your link...I would like an explanation for why it was flagged and removed.

It's because it's nonsense. ~200M Americans have received a COVID vaccine. Some of those people died afterwards. Correlation does not imply causation.

There is plenty of nonsense on HN. I'd like to evaluate it for myself.

It might be getting flagged because the author of the PDF started out openly with the objective of linking deaths to vaccines. That or that it's not an objective document, it reads like a hit piece on vaccines with shaky evidence and random unsourced testimonials.

When you read PDF with that in mind, the author's repeated pointing to the massive jump in unverified self-report stats on VAERS (right after the president of the United States cast aspersions on vaccinations to boot) doesn't really feel that compelling.

So what? It’s asserting an analysis that the vaccine is killing people.

Doctors have an obligation to report adverse events on VAERS, which they don’t actually seem to be doing very frequently as far as reactions are seen.

Really? Let me try

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-vaers-deaths/fact-...

That's not the link that GP tried to post.

[flagged]

We've banned this account for using HN for political/ideological battle. That's not allowed here, regardless of which ideology you favor, because it destroys what this site is supposed to be for, i.e. curious and thoughtful conversation. Political battle is the opposite of that.

If you don't want to be banned, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you'll follow the rules in the future, but please don't create accounts to break HN's rules with.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Reply on news.ycombinator.com