Hacker News Reader

Must indeed have been quite naive, working for UAE, a dictatorship, where they still have what basically constitutes a modern form of slavery.

Perhaps not even former NSA employees are immune to the stuff influencers on social media pump out. Have a nice life in beautiful Abu Dhabi? Why not? It takes little to inform oneself about the country and the people in power though. I cannot understand, how one can move to another country and not look such stuff up. My guess about this is, that other people are simply way less hesitant to make such a move. Then of course there is the payment matter. With proper payment, perhaps we are willing to overlook certain things more easily or to not look too closely in the first place.

His payment do not seems so crazy. 200k for devs and 500k for manager.

that's crazy high even for most of the US

$200k is not "crazy high" - it's higher than a lot, for sure, but if you're in a HCOL area and work for a big company (not even FAANG-level) you can make that much within a few years at most. FAANG is even higher - median new grad total comp at Google is about $190k. Senior is almost twice that.

Google is one of the best paying companies for new grads in the world, much better than government work

Top computer security professional can make a lot of money. 10+ years ago I knew someone making 350k in northern VA and a few people over the 200k range. It’s generally an unpleasant job with a small talent pool and plenty of options to move into other areas.

$350k isn't an "incredible" compensation package, and $200k shouldn't be considered high. You can earn that remotely pretty much anywhere working for a FAANG or fintech.

I'm making $500k+ in Atlanta as a reference point. As are my coworkers. I'm not super senior, and I'm not bragging. I just want to spread awareness of the existence and obtainability of these salaries.

These kinds of compensations are not unheard of at all in tech. While I'm not making quite as much as OP, I am coming close.

Unheard of no, but it’s somewhat like suggesting every actor should aim for Hollywood A lister compensation because the jobs are out there. The top 1% compensation in any field tends to be wildly outside the norm and it keeps going up from there.

The equivalent would be telling other actors to audition for roles at [big studio] because they pay way better than [indie firm/commericals/etc]. And then everyone else coming along and being like "pfft why even bother".

A lot of people think they can't get jobs at high paying tech companies, when they can. Or they think it'd cost them their work-life-balance, when it often doesn't. Or that they wouldn't be able to handle it, when that shouldn't be a factor at all.

People aren’t saying why bother to apply, their saying why bother to promote such salaries as somehow common. More people applying doesn’t somehow increase the number of openings it just pushes down salaries at [big studio].

I mean Google getting 300 vs 200 applicants for an opening is kind of silly thing to promote.

> why bother to promote such salaries as somehow common

Because common isn't the right word. Attainable is.

Looking back, we are responding to a post saying “$200k shouldn't be considered high.” That’s not saying 200+k is Attainable that’s saying 200k is common.

They also say $350k isn't an "incredible" which seems to suggest it’s more than just attainable it’s a reasonable goal.

This is a totally false characterization, Retric.

If you're happy with a 100k salary, far be it from me to commiserate. But don't tell other people they can't attain higher compensation that puts them into the top 1% of earners. These jobs are real, they're not scarce, and they're absolutely not overly difficult to attain. You don't even need a college degree.

Don't tell people not to look. That's horrible.

Why not let us all in on a little secret and actually tell us what position and what certifications would be expected and required for this unicorn $500k job title? I know plenty of principle engineers, many of which are 10xers who make nowhere near this salary at all. So do tell a little bit.

Came back hours later after work and browsed levels.fyi a bit, I do see these total compensation levels specifically for FAANGs but misunderstood as you saying it was not for a FAANG and was a base salary. Probably just my understanding. I can see $500k-$1m for a FAANG with base/stock option/tenure/bonus.

Being a SWE with even an implementor background in security is quite lucrative. Someone has to make all the crypto libraries that mathematicians come up with.

Not sure if UAE is the same but my friends who worked in Saudi paid $0 income tax (some token amount of US tax to avoid the gaze of the IRS) and had their house and car arranged by the company. So a $200k salary in SA was much more akin to a $350k salary in California in terms of the amount of money you’d save.

If you are American you still pay us taxes, no matter where you live. And you may need to report the house and car as taxable income as well.

> If you are American you still pay us taxes, no matter where you live.

You have to file, yes, but you don't necessarily have to pay. For Federal taxes there is the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion. As long as you are outside of the US for at least 330 days in a year you can exclude up to $108,700 (for 2021) in foreign earnings. There are a few other scenarios too.

In this case you would pay. No FEIC if you don't pay taxes in the country where you earned the income. The UAE doesn't have a federal income tax and has no tax treaty with the US so several boxes are missing for FEIC.

> No FEIC if you don't pay taxes in the country where you earned the income

That's technically only true for one of the two possible tests for FEIE. The presence test doesn't require any taxes to be paid anywhere else, and the bona fide resident test only requires that your "tax home" is in a different country.

I'm not 100% sure but for former NSA folks I think that is pretty great. I don't think the NSA pays all that well. At least not if you are used to fang salaries.

The same moral reasoning can make nearly anything immoral. For example, is it morally right to pay taxes to Uncle Sam, knowing he will use them to pay for drone strikes in wars he started killing millions in the third world? Is the only moral option to give up ones citizenship and move to another country?

Yet, very very few people do this.

Is writing code for the UAE to help them kill people so different to paying money to the USA to help them kill people?

If you're an American citizen it absolutely is.

I find value in being ethically consistent, but I don't care for arguments like these.

Another variation of this is "why should I care about ethical issue 'X' since we all purchase goods and services that enable child or exploitative labor in another part of the world?" People can care about multiple issues at the same time. The fact that I, by necessity, have to participate in systems that enable oppression doesn't mean I should throw my hands up and disregard ethical decision making entirely.

I'm not saying it's happening in this case, but often these types of arguments do little more than serve as reactionary push-back against those seeking to solve issue "X" rather than being borne out of actual concern for the issue they've propped up in its place or some sort of concern about ethical consistency.

If you're in Northern Virginia, you'll see that many ex-NSA employees have evolved to also sell personal location data to Saudi Arabia and other despots. There are a dozen of these companies all working in the "ad" space.

Honestly it takes a certain kind of person to work in government in the first place. That person is not you or me.

I can believe it. I remember hurting my back right before a trip to Singapore. I was prescribed hydrocodone by my doctor knowing that was the only chance I had of getting any sleep on the flight. I land and my coworker reminds Me Singapore has death penalty level punishment for “hard” drugs so I immediately flushed it all down the toilet despite having a valid prescription which probably would have been fine.

It’s easy to forget to do research on a country before you go there when it’s not something you’d consider “third world”.

The US doesn't have the moral high ground either. Every country has issues.

As a German who's currently in Dubai, I find it amusing when an American judges the UAE.

The US has tons of undocumented/illegal immigrants which live in horrible conditions, but companies still employ them because they're cheap. How's that not modern slavery? How about all the H1B abuses?

In the UAE some companies may abuse the situation of foreign workers too, but the government clearly says you should not hand out your passport.

My American coworkers get taxed on their worldwide income, which basically only one other country does. Dictatorship?

The US started killed so many innocent people in the Middle East to get their hands on the oil.

> The US doesn't have the moral high ground either.

> The US started killed so many innocent people in the Middle East to get their hands on the oil.

Thanks for writing your comment, i was thinking of writing something similar.

> I find it amusing when an American judges the UAE.

yeah i don't understand how Americans gloss over the myriad of contradictions, and just the overall violence, of US foreign policy

i'd like to leave this important video here for anyone who hasn't yet seen it: The CIA is a Terrorist Organization // https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2khAmMTAjI

To be very clear, to me the NSA or UAE NESA are one in the same. I wasn't pointing out one side being better than the other. He went from one, to another. NO government has any moral high ground, or character in my book. A state is a state. A state seeks to control and manipulate it's populace and others for it's own means. Period. And any government employee doing something as "just a job" for a state which infringes on any rights of a citizen is in the same book to me. For example, an IRS worker isn't any better than an NSA. One is spying on your finances and stealing your money, the other is surveiliing in the name of whatever hot-button lie of the month/year is up next. CSAM today!

> Given the number of trainings that he would have attended while working at the NSA, I find it hard to believe that his OpSec radar wouldn't have been going off at that point.

These types of training tend to be very specific, and certainly do not involve questioning chain of command.

This is why he immediately noticed things like possible surveillance, but it took him much longer to question the mission and his commanding officer.

>These types of training tend to be very specific, and certainly do not involve questioning chain of command.

True, but this excerpt was describing his initial interview process with CyberPoint. I agree with the general sentiment though.

I think a lot of the external view of the NSA's training is tinted by Snowden's books and writing.

It is important to remember that Snowden was also CIA before he worked at NSA, and went through full CIA training for CIA staff stationed in foreign embassies (he was in Geneva, and I think Japan?).

Bingo. This is essentially the "PR" cover story that all ousted government employees seem to use once they're caught out. "Oh, I didn't realize I was even working for a murderous regime! I liked the paycheck though!"

>Given the number of trainings that he would have attended while working at the NSA, I find it hard to believe that his OpSec radar wouldn't have been going off at that point.

I've seen a similar line of thinking with regard to federal employees (who should have known better) and were successfully recruited, but then later arrested. You have to wonder to what degree they're telling the truth, or to what degree they really had blinders due to being so successfully charmed. Either way, this is common. I think it's hard for people to say "yes, I knew deep down this was a problem but hoped it wasn't true somehow."

imho NSA people is technically skilled but politically naive... and that's clearly why they work for NSA in the first place...

Technical training can make you good a something, but it doesn't necessarily make you aware of why you are doing something and what are the political consequences.

That's why also social science education and critical thinking is needed... to avoid those kind of situations.

I don't think that's the only reason people work for the NSA. Lots of people who are patriots (in their mind) go because they think it's a good cause. And I'm sure there are also political operators who do it because they think it's a way up whatever ladder they're climbing.

I would argue it's pretty naive to assume the positions of people internal to an organization such as the NSA. The NSA, just like the D.o.D., and the greater government employs people from all walks of life. They have representation of almost all major religions, atheists, democrats, republicans, libertarians, etc. It's no less diverse than other offices. I would also argue that the number of college educated to include PHD's is astronomical.

Plenty of critical thinking happens to avoid situations. In this case, a service member that probably made 50k all in, was given a juicy contracting offer above the local market rate for the time (though for good operators, $200k local wasn't unheard of at the time). He saw the money, went to Dubai.

Everyone in the agency knew of this contract, almost everyone said the same thing.. Screw that. A few took it, cashed in for a year or two, then left.

The fringe number of people that took this contract are far fewer than the vast number that said no. I know I said no, and about a dozen others that said the same. On the same shoe I knew two that did, most didn't last over a year.

> Given the number of trainings that he would have attended while working at the NSA

Right, so he was used to doing sketchy things and not questioning the ethics of what his superiors told him to do, just the right kind/level of sketchy for the right people, and didn't realize this was going to be a different kind/level of sketchy that would ultimately make him uncomfortable.