IMO bitbucket is okay. Its UX for PRs is amazing, 1000x better than Githubs. Especially its side by side diff.
This concludes, and fully encompasses, everything good that I have to say about Atlassian products.
This concludes, and fully encompasses, everything good that I have to say about Atlassian products.
Includes the language breakdown and such. Makes it much easier to know if you should be blocking out 5 mins to 5 hours to review something and if you even should be depending on the language.
Alas, Atlassian does not offer PVA for Bitbucket (it was meant to be there in July) so I cannot release it since it costs me money to host. I really wish they would invest more time into Bitbucket.
We moved from Bitbucket On-prem to Gitlab and I must admit I do miss parts of Bitbucket's UI. It was much easier to find reviews you needed to do and it was much clearer when reviewers had finished reviewing and if work needed to be done. Gitlab should just copy this stuff.
Ultimately we’ve decided to build on top of our server platforms and target companies with 1000+ employees from day one. That decision had a huge impact on how we approached performance and what features we prioritised. The hierarchy of projects and permissions associated with them as well as the way we designed Pull Requests are good examples of that.
It was the right decision at the time, even if the product happened to be different in cloud and server, which did lead to some confusion. But Stash customers were really happy with the product.