This has been here before:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2420201
I'm mentioning it because I think that source is actually much more informative.
I'm mentioning it because I think that source is actually much more informative.
I find it difficult to give you the benefit of the doubt when it looks like you have used text from other sources in the past without giving any attribution at all.
http://blog.alertfox.com/2011/05/myth-by-reporting-infrastru... seems to use text from a HP whitepaper on infrastructure monitoring from 2008, "Five Myths of Infrastructure Monitoring: How End User Monitoring Can Help You Improve Customer Satisfaction".
http://blog.alertfox.com/2011/05/www-or-no-www-is-not-same.h... seems to have some of the same text at http://www.awebguy.com/2011/02/seo-tip-www-or-no-www/
There's no original content here at all - flagged...