I applaud to this newfound maxim, "an alternative is not a solution (per se)". Very good synthesis.
The sinister side of these times is in the roots that made such notion shaky to some. Something related to the fading of the idea of "doing it properly".
--
Edit: in the example of the idea of "extending the right to vote to infant children", which I mentioned in a parallel post as part of the trend, there is an important image: one of the proponents, during an interview (in the recent podcast of Jeremy Paxman), asked why, replied along the lines of «To shake this stagnant system».
There is the point: _do not shake it_: improve it, fix it, debug it, re-engineer it; do not hit it with a hammer hoping it improves by winning determinism through the sheer force of luck, do not attempt electroconvulsive therapy, do not stick an ice pick in that thalamus in the idea that random sabotage can be even remotely comparable with the clever blueprints of a neural organism - it cannot bring an improvement (which should go without saying, yet was actual practice).