Comparative Effectiveness of Moderna, Pfizer and J&J Vaccines

My point is they excluded 32% of their universe due to being immune compromised. If you look at the link, references and quotes I provided the way Effectiveness is defined compared to Efficacy is exactly by including everybody.

The second point of the study, that I interpret as showing a little lack of intellectual honesty, is that this exclusion provides for a higher effectiveness rate ( great for media quotes). Also as effectiveness is a measure that varies based on the time when you track it, they should have clarified that, and stated instead the vaccine was this effective from date so and so ( in this case March 11–August 15 )

What about I do a study like this: I let the immunity wane, measure effectiveness 1 year from now, then say Moderna or Pfizer vaccine effectiveness was 25%. In that case you can be sure everybody in the clinical expert group would be very precise in defining when effectiveness is supposed to be measured... :-) As the industry does not an have a standard for that period of time this game gets played around and the subtleties get lost in most media reports.

And ultimately, where is the ethics of creating vaccine mandates that include everybody, as its being done in many countries, at the recommendation of experts like the ones responsible for this study? Because some of these mandates put at peril some people, even mentioning risk of legally loosing their jobs, while excluding the immune compromised from vaccine studies?

Exclude them from vaccine studies? Then exclude them from the mandates.