Researchers bake malware protection directly into SSDs
tomshardware.com
tomshardware.com
What I would trust:
A backup medium (SSD or whatever) which only allows writes to empty space. Unless a switch is manually switched from "write" to "update".
In "write" mode, it would only allow writing to empty space.
In "update" mode, it would allow writing everywhere.
I would leave it in "write" mode most of the time. For me, a typical SSD has enough space for years of incremental backups. If I should ever want to delete old backups, I would set it to "update" mode to do that and then set it back to "write" mode.
Why is your backup medium not encrypted?
If you lose the key, you lose the backup.
I'm also wondering how the hashes will be kept up to date. Will it require a host program to communicate with the drive over a proprietary protocol? If so then that arguably makes this pointless, as obviously they're only going to work on Windows.
In the pursuit of security (or just the excuse of it), more functionality is being given to opaque, locked systems (SSD firmware, management engines, etc.), instead of freedom-respecting solutions (there is no technical reason systems can't be fully open-source, with user-controlled cryptographic keys, and a tamper-evident mechanism as some smartphones already have - i.e. a "bootloader unlocked" warning message).
This moves power away from users and to the manufacturers, contributes to the jenga-tower of technical complexity, and eventually worsens security, once vulnerabilities in these systems are inevitably found:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine#Securi...
Linux is the new 'hardware compatibility layer'
I don't see the appeal compared to a fully software-based solution.
Much more interesting you can run Linux on HDD firmware of 2013 [1]. That would allow you to implement such yourself.
Also, I wouldn't buy it because I don't want anti-virus built into my hardware. I'm just not interested in the protection it provides.