yeah. This is the “I hate social media” equivalent of the daily mail’s pop science coverage. Most of it’s wrong, and the parts that aren’t are totally uninformative.
You got a big list of arguments for one viewpoint. You might want to point to evidence of your opposing view instead of dismissing the science without addressing any of its claims.
I’m strongly in agreement with the goal and the sentiment of the project, but not with its execution. We need a lot more epistemic humility and contextualization for this to not just seem like just another political project.