Perhaps we should go with "needs repair" or something like that ?
"Risk" feels like insurance territory (which goes along with "there is always some risk"), and a lot of people beautify the notion of taking risks to get higher gains.
Perhaps we should go with "needs repair" or something like that ?
"Risk" feels like insurance territory (which goes along with "there is always some risk"), and a lot of people beautify the notion of taking risks to get higher gains.
There's laws against bad cars, there's no laws against bad software.
There's often privacy/data protection obligations, but they seem to be impossibly difficult to get the courts to pay attention to. If the average business owner would find themselves in legal shit every time an external party got access to their data (i.e. just being the victim of a ransomware attack puts you at risk of losing your home), they would probably pay more attention.
That said, I feel that car shops just work because, well, it's the law, especially in some countries.
In the end "needs repair" is the same as saying "mitigating accident risk".
And if you have a 15 year car with a clapped out motor, you are not going to achieve modern safety and fuel efficiency by swapping the worn-out motor with a NOS replacement, so there's a point where investing money in the old solution isn't going to move you into the future you need.