Hacker News Reader

The video in the Tweet replies is even worse, IMO: https://twitter.com/TaylorOgan/status/1437743602579423233

The Tesla FSD would've caused a t-bone in the first two clips, and a head-on collision at decent speed in the third clip. Yikes.

View on HN

How long can they get away with charging 10k for something that is trying to crash the car in to bits?

Everything about FSD is truly mindblowing. They sold the product but are not letting most users get the version that tries to be autonomous (and thank god for that). It won't be available to most of these people on the car they purchased it for, and can't be transferred to other cars. That has to end in a refund or class action law suit right? And now they have a subscription available? That also doesn't include these features? Who are the suckers paying monthly for this, especially after years of failed promises about this product (that's giving the benefit of the doubt, I think "lies" is more appropriate at this point).

Companies seem to be able to get away with these kinds of shenanigans in some jurisdictions, but what blows my mind is that the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) hasn't yet come down on them like a ton of bricks.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com