It was written at the end of 2019, do you think it's just wrong? Or has it changed that much in the past 2 years? Or is it a different set of startups?
Actually I've seen nothing to suggest that valuations have changed since our article. If you're seeing differently, all feedback welcome.
I should add that I always have a lingering concern that so many people reference that article - both founders and investors - that in some ways it's moved from reflecting market to making market... which means the bar to making sure it's accurate is high.
The lowest valuation I've paid was £3m, and this happened exactly once.
My mean valuation for seed is around £8-10m.
It tops out at around £20m.
Perhaps my sample is skewed. Not many of the companies I'm investing in use SeedLegals. Investors often insist they use actual lawyers.
The benefits to a founder of shopping around seem clear, so could you quantify the downside risks? Do the risks matter for a “hot deal”?
PS: Thank you so much for your awesome article: it is especially gratifying to see something that isn’t from the valley (I am in NZ).
More commonly, you develop a bad reputation in the VC community, which is very close-knit. Next time you come to raise money, this can hurt.
Looking forward to seeing whatever you do next!
Should European remote startups re-domicile in the US for fundraising (or other) purposes?
We have a London presence/HQ, the team works from 4 European countries, and we raised pre-seed during Covid.