IANAL, but I understood Meeting Of Minds to refer to the need for both parties to a contract to actually agree that a contract exists.

From the wiki page you reference for example:

> The reasoning is that a party should not be held to a contract that they were not even aware existed.

And later on, something directly relevant to this discussion perhaps:

> Mutual assent is vitiated by actions such as fraud, undue influence, duress, mutual mistake, or misrepresentation.

I think that this discussion is more closely related to the legal concept of a Mistake [0], which absolutely can be something that a court might address. Though even that doesn't seem like quite a perfect fit here.

[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mistake_(contract_law)#Mutua...