Dürer's Rhinoceros
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Dürer got many specifics wrong, but the Gestalt of his rhinoceros is true to the original --- an original he'd never seen. And that that original was real, unlike other fantastical creatures (dragons, griffins, unicorns, kraken) which were often reported or pictured, but for which we've found no evidence. Over time, evidence of, and information on, the rhinocerous became more substantial and converged on a more consistent and accurate understanding.
Which gives a notion for determining when some novel, rare, and uncertain phenomenon does reflect on some ground truth of the Universe, and not merely hallucinations at the edge of perceptibility. I'd chosen Dürer's image to illustrate that concept:
https://joindiaspora.com/posts/874e7c10d09c0139a7e5002590d8e...
I'm reminded of the first identified Neanderthal being arthritic, resulting in their being constantly depicted as stooped and bent even in the modern era.
First impressions / models matter.