For example, J.P. Morgan’s most recent capital market assumptions forecast a compound annual return of just 4.1% for large-cap U.S. stocks (e.g., S&P 500 Index) over the next 10 to 15 years. This is in stark contrast to the 10% to 12% historical returns pop-finance personalities often cite when setting expectations for future returns. For this reason, performing forward-looking analysis based on historical investment performance could result in grossly optimistic results and a false sense of security.
Monte Carlo simulation does in fact account for sequence of return risk through volatility and random number generation (but perhaps I misunderstood your point on that front).
As for the cyclical nature of returns, that’s a topic that continues to be debated. The historical behavior of markets in a developed country with enforced property rights, relatively strong institutions, and victories in two World Wars (e.g., the U.S.) is much different compared to other parts of the world. Maybe mean-reversion exists, or maybe we like to see patterns in data. In any event, we do plan to add customizable mean-reverting functionality in the near future.
Here’s some more info you might find helpful:
Studies of Market Behavior in Academia:
https://www.honestmath.com/learn/academia
Perspectives on how little we actually know, and how little historical returns might actually tell us:
https://www.honestmath.com/learn/nobody
Some more relevant thoughts:
https://www.honestmath.com/learn/simulation-probabilities-ar...