Post WW1 didn't erode rights, it actually increased them. Post WW2, the same.
Korea and Vietnam didn't leave behind any long term repression that I remember.
War on drugs and terror, ok.
Covid is a disease. We have vaccines, we'll have treatment. Just get vaccinated. We've had pandemics before, they always end and I can't remember any rights still taken away abusively after the Spanish Flu or SARS or HIV.
>Post WW1 didn't erode rights, it actually increased them. Post
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedition_Act_of_1918
>Post WW2, the same.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_Act
And on and on. There are libraries written about this, but no one cares because there has been a bi-partisan consensus that citizen's rights need to be curtailed.
> As part of a sweeping repeal of wartime laws, Congress repealed the Sedition Act on December 13, 1920
The second wasn't a wartime act and even that was repealed. Talk about cherry picking.
The Sedition Act was used to silence opposition to conscription and gave us the immortal quote of "The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schenck_v._United_States
Of course the 'fire' in that case was this letter: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schenck_v._United_States#/medi...
Which seems like an extremely level headed question about conscription in the US given that involuntary servitude should only be a punishment for a crime.
Don't worry, you'll be doing both and it won't be temporary.
And you won't be getting the freedoms you gave up back, since the police are already using your location data to arrest you: https://theconversation.com/police-access-to-covid-check-in-...