Hacker News Reader

... when the list of things being analyzed is "Android, Eclipse, the Linux kernel, MeeGo, Firefox, Qt, Symbian, and WebKit."

Let's not forget that they rated a dead version of Symbian:

"based on the governance model of the Symbian Foundation prior to the the platform's transition back to a closed model"

[the repeated "the" is in the article].

Use the original title:

"Study: Android is least open of open source mobile platforms"

That title is worse because it contains the words "mobile platforms". They actually looked at Android, Eclipse, the Linux kernel, MeeGo, Firefox, Qt, Symbian, and WebKit. Those aren't all "mobile" (per se) and they aren't all "platforms".

What about WebOS?

Misleading title.