Hacker News Reader

Comment by GekkePrutser | Hacker News Reader

This kind of block will stop absolutely no-one. It's just for show.

Edit: Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/2047227/downloading-increase...

Maybe no-one technical, but here in the UK where DNS-based blocking is very prevalent, I know most of my non-technical friends don’t know how to access a website that’s been blocked in this way, and wouldn’t think to look for mirrors. I’ve tried to explain the process of piracy via torrents to people and it just goes over their heads.

You don't need mirrors, you just need a DNS server that doesn't implement this policy.

Historically the government reaction to that was to censor the DNS protocol itself. Trouble is, by the time they got around to legislating for such things, DNS is already optionally encrypted. In Firefox for example General -> Networking Settings -> Enable DNS over HTTPS

And you don't think Sony Music is going to make them block use-application-dns.net next, for being a circumvention tool or something?

use-application-dns.net is a canary for the default behaviour, but the configuration switch I described is a deliberate user choice, so the canary isn't relevant.

Ah but I'm not talking about getting around the actual DNS part (even though that is indeed trivial).

I'm talking about obtaining the content. Sooner or later they'll just ask a techie friend where they can still get their sweet torrents and they're back in business.

They've blocked the pirate bay in the Netherlands for a long time and it was hardly effective at all. In fact it did the opposite: https://www.pcworld.com/article/2047227/downloading-increase...

And finally, don't forget: The people who are using Quad 9 are people who do know what they're doing. Otherwise they'd be simply using their provider DNS.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com