VMware backs down, changes vSphere 5 pricing
gigaom.com
gigaom.com
It looks like VMware is trying pretty hard to capture most of the surplus value created by the cheaper ram.
I mean, it's been long said that VMware will look at how much money you can save by virtualizing and consolidating your old hardware, then they try to charge just enough less than that number to make the project still worth doing; In the past, I think, this has been seen as more reasonable, as vmware is helping to create some of that value.
Moving to grab some of the surplus value created by cheap high-density ram, something VMware has nothing to do with, I think, has been seen as unjustified and greedy in the SysAdmin world; it remains to be seen if still charging by the gigabyte of ram but just charging less will be accepted.
I think the main area that VMWare still has a win, from people I know who use it, are management tools and the ability to prioritize/allocate/throttle IO on network block devices (SANs) per vm.
VMWare is an enterprise product. How many big enterprises are using Hyper-V? (A: Zero, officially anyway)