What Apple mouses and Braun shavers share
rubenerd.com
rubenerd.com
I also have an old Philips electric shaver. When the battery dies in the middle of a shave (obviously that's always while in use that the battery dies, unless you shave only twice a year), I can plug it in and use it while plugged no problem.
So I have a simple solution for OP: choose different brands.
Turning off when charging sounds like a way to prevent someone to follow through with the shockingly brilliant idea of doing that while plugged in to the wall socket.
Meanwhile the Apple Mouse thing was (I presume) Johnny Ive & his obsessions getting in the way of real world usability. I don’t think anyone is going to die if they use an Apple mouse whilst it’s plugged into a usb port!
Sounds like your specific one has a defective battery. Or design.
Though, it's a not a direct replacement of Braun Series 7 mentioned in TFA - it's mainly a trimmer.
Heck, buy one even if you shave more often.
You don't have to shave down to the skin, you can use it to trim a beard. I've been doing this for years.
Daily proof that Twitter is cancer and if the entire site was nuked tomorrow humanity would have lost absolutely nothing of value.
1. don't read comments
2. only follow those you find interesting
We would probably gain some value.
The main issue with the mouse is everything else. It is uncomfortable to hold, painful to move around, awkward to click and do the gestures. The sensor is worse than a generic $10 mouse you can get off Amazon. It misses the first couple of clicks every morning.
Horrible, horrible mouse. But not because of the charging port, that's ok.
But then you might have something urgent to do and cannot stop using the mouse. Then...you forget about recharging. Rinse and repeat, until you get at 0%. I know it's not a big deal but it would not have been a big deal either allowing the mouse to work and recharge via USB at the same time by not putting the port beneath it.
While I admit that it seems rare/odd, I can imagine trying to look up an address, catch a bus, and my mouse dies.
10 seconds becomes minutes, and bus missed.
I think the point here is, it could have been designed like thousands of other mice on the market, was not, and Apple is supposed to be about usability.
Hand waving "but you could do this", doesn't change the fact that you're having to do this, instead of using your mouse.
Perhaps this is what Think Different means? You're using it wrong?
Even the Bose isn't great here because plugging it in causes a Bluetooth disconnect and reconnect which sometimes confuses Windows. So I have to power off, plug in, power on. But I can at least use it as a wired headset then.
Instead of: "Everything about Sony WH-1000XM3 is awesome"
Or: "I love the Sony WH-1000XM3, everything about it is awesome"?
It's a growing trend but unlike others (which are often down to regional differences), I can't figure out why people do this.
With most adapters being at the wall, and a DC small-voltage current coming to the shaver, the risk of electrocution should be small, but I am sure we'd see people dragging extension cords with them into their showers, so that's a pretty reasonable safety measure too!
One of the appeals of the Magic Mouse (at least to me) is exactly the form and shape of the touch surface. I can't even remember when was the last time I charged it, but I certainly enjoy the way it feels as I am holding it right now.
The shaver probably demands more power than the charger provides.
[1] https://edition.cnn.com/style/article/dieter-rams-film-exhib...
However, there are some “modern” shavers available now from Philips which offer 60 minutes of shaving with a 90 minutes charge time, so there is hope yet.
Both drawing power from a battery and charging seem to heat them up, perhaps both at the same time would exceed their thermal limits or at least degrade the lifespan of the battery.
I suspect devices that work while plugged in have circuitry that entirely or at least partially bypasses the battery to power the device. Then I guess it's a question of if the intended usage of the device can justify the additional complexity/failure modes/cost of the additional circuitry.