Thoughts on the Upcoming Fujifilm X-T30 II
fujixweekly.com
fujixweekly.com
Sometimes hard choices have to be made. This is ugly but seems better than no X-T30s for sale!
This is mildly infuriating. The X-T3 is nearly two generations old, why bother? Also you're telling me that the price of my camera was $100 more because of the damn battery charger?? I've literally never used it. X-T3 has USB-C charging, which was frankly the reason I bought it. Why not just go full Nintendo and stop shipping battery chargers altogether?
Give me a dedicated external charger any day of the week! Anyway I'm happy with the firmware upgrades the X-T3 received so far, bringing it up to the same AF performance level of the X-T4. Fujifilm has always spent it's firmware update efforts mainly on the X-T* range, all other bodies (x-pro, x-e, X-T*, x100) typically get abandoned shortly after release.
I've... never found this to be the case. Almost everything I have charges by USB-C. In particular, being able to charge the camera on the go with a battery in my backpack while I'm shooting is a huge feature for me. If I'm capturing video I already have the door open (or removed) and an external monitor/capture card plugged in, so there's nothing unusual about an extra cable.
I have multiple batteries, but I typically also use the grip to charge them via AC adapter so it's the same deal.
Do you always put your phone on the floor near a wall socket while you charge it? My phone wasn't too much cheaper than my camera, and I don't really concern myself with shorts/electrical damage when charging.
Besides, I don't really need multiple batteries (aside from the grip) because I can just use an external, portable, universal battery, of which I have several.
X-T30 II has more memory and a better LCD compared to the X-T30.
https://fujixweekly.com/2021/09/02/additional-thoughts-on-th...
They admit that the firmware upgrade can't be applied, at least in the form that it's been produced. The X-T30 II is therefore a minor upgrade, which is nothing notable.
Great irony: the author has no clue about what the firmware actually improves. So he's essentially written a rant about expecting something he doesn't what it is.
Personally, I apply film simulation modes to a picture on my computer in post to the RAW file, because I don’t have time, when actually taking pictures, to decide which film simulation will work best for a given shot.
Now that's a bit dishonest. When you buy a camera you invest in the system. Spending 1k euros on the body alone and and the same on various lenses and then getting shafted on one or two film simulations that won't be added to your camera because it's now old after 1 or 2 years, it leaves a sour taste. Esp. since mobile phones and other electronics get software updates regularly.
> Personally, I apply film simulation modes to a picture on my computer in post to the RAW file,
Great for you, but then one appeal of the Fuji system is the SOOC quality and experience. But if they don't care about that, it's making me loose interest.
Sure, they have the GFX series with huge sensors, but that is a niche market.
They should do something like the APS-C equivalent of Sony a1 with a fast-readout sensor for their format, and maybe remove the mechanical shutter for good. What they've been doing for the past few years is just boring and plain.
Fuji did, too. And to this day it does not support the X-E3, but does support the X-T3, which is basically identical, save for a different viewfinder placement and a few very minor things.
Back when I bought a new camera I also pondered whether to buy the X-E3 or the X-T3 and… chose the future loser, of course.