I believe that the whole Texas anti-abortion law is unfair. Nevertheless, undermining public discourse based on political preference is going to be always wrong.
Ultimately, data is always served from someone’s private server somewhere.
There is a real argument that, in a more ideal world, YouTube, Facebook, WhatsApp, etc. would be viewed as infrastructure and regulated as such. Imagine if your power company refused to provide you power because they didn't like that you ran a gas-powered car plant; regardless of their ability to provide for you. Or if your telephone company refused to service you because they didn't like what you might tell your friends or that you were the head of a political party they didn't like.
Also I agree ISP and internet connections should be a public utility just like telephone. Even though we had that whole ATT monopoly.
But websites are not utilities at all. They are stores. Are we now saying Walmart cant kick people out for screaming crazy stuff in there stores?
As for screaming crazy stuff, that'd be Disorderly Conduct. However, Walmart shouldn't be able to kick out people for, say, a private conversation they disagree with.