https://m.jpost.com/health-science/israeli-scientist-says-co...
https://m.jpost.com/health-science/israeli-scientist-says-co...
Not peer reviewed, and the comments seem to point out a lot of poor methodology.
Naturally also followed by a lot of “why would anyone in academia ever lie about results”.
I think it's possible, just barely possible, that when the results of a supposed random drug trial are available exclusively on YouTube, and are suspiciously absent from medical journals and government databases, you should treat the alleged "outcome" with extreme skepticism.
Is the Ivermectin in the horse product different from the human version?
Or does the FDA just have higher standards for animal v human products and no one knows if the line making the horse product is clean and free of things like benzene (industrial solvent, liquid cancer, that sometimes makes it into products, sunscreen most recently)?