ERs backed up with ivermectin overdosers while gunshot victims wait: Oklahoma DR
insider.com
insider.com
I’m going to add this to the list of events that the media have reported that turned out to be not true at all like.
Take the Jan 6th riots at the Capitol. Heard much about those bombs planted at Democrat and Republican HQs? What about the cop who was murdered with a fire extinguisher? Oh yeah, that was made up. Apparently it was an organized rebellion led by Trump, but oh yeah, the FBI just concluded it wasn’t.
You’d be served well to assume every news report is bullshit until proven otherwise. Whatever side you’re on.
I hope he chooses something to do with eating premium horse feed, it's very tasty, like muesli.
Why wouldn't this happen? Thousands of hospitals are warning that they're filling up. My friend who works in a hospital says there are patients in hallways.
Nothing about this situation is unpredictable or unlikely. People have been expecting it for many months.
Combine that with the desperate news organizations for clicks and you get stories like this.
https://www.politico.com/2020-election/results/oklahoma/
Hover over the south eastern counties that the article is referring to, you get like 85% votes for Trump, some of the highest margins in the nation.
Which also explains the story, because they're the ones most likely to take and overdose ivermectin.
https://dailycaller.com/2021/09/05/hospital-blows-holes-roll...
Message from the administration of Northeastern Health System - Sequoyah:
Although Dr. Jason McElyea is not an employee of NHS Sequoyah, he is affiliated with a medical staffing group that provides coverage for our emergency room.
With that said, Dr. McElyea has not worked at our Sallisaw location in over 2 months.
NHS Sequoyah has not treated any patients due to complications related to taking ivermectin. This includes not treating any patients for ivermectin overdose.
All patients who have visited our emergency room have received medical attention as appropriate. Our hospital has not had to turn away any patients seeking emergency care.
We want to reassure our community that our staff is working hard to provide quality healthcare to all patients. We appreciate the opportunity to clarify this issue and as always, we value our community’s support.
The “doctor” doesn’t even work at the hospital.
Like I said in later replies, the media feeds off this kind of clickbait outrage. If you come across something really outrageous it’s mostly like untrue or at least exaggerated.
The sad part is how widely shit like this is reported. Nobody bothered to even vaguely attempt to valid the story? Even check if the “doctor” works there? Even check if the county the hospital in has a lot of shootings. I mean, even just call the hospital to get a comment.
Most news is total garbage.
Let’s upperbound an average worst-case situation. If every single person ingested Ivermectin and needed emergency care last month that did, that would be 88000/50 people in need of emergency care per state assuming a uniform distribution of such cases across the US by state, which I know is false but we are just concerned with the order of the problem. Still that’s 1700 people per state, or about 50 people per day per state in need of care. How many hospitals are there per state on average? Oklahoma has ~150, so that’s 50/150 cases per hospital per day. That’s .3 people per hospital per day seeking emergency care for Ivermectin. Does this “clog” the system? Maybe if it’s already overwhelmed by COVID, which it seems to be in Oklahoma.
Of course, this is a back of the envelope approximation, but I’m skeptical that this is the problem it is being presented as.
From the FDA page linked in the article on the horse formulation:
"Ivermectin Products for Animals Are Different from Ivermectin Products for People
For one thing, animal drugs are often highly concentrated because they are used for large animals like horses and cows, which weigh a lot more than we do—a ton or more. Such high doses can be highly toxic in humans. Moreover, the FDA reviews drugs not just for safety and effectiveness of the active ingredients, but also for the inactive ingredients. Many inactive ingredients found in products for animals aren’t evaluated for use in people. Or they are included in much greater quantity than those used in people. In some cases, we don’t know how those inactive ingredients will affect how ivermectin is absorbed in the human body."
They also claim to be concerned that people may not take the medication when they may need it; yet leave out that it should be taken under supervision, can interfere with common medications, and can overdose.
"When Can Taking Ivermectin Be Unsafe?
...
There’s a lot of misinformation around, and you may have heard that it’s okay to take large doses of ivermectin. It is not okay.
Even the levels of ivermectin for approved human uses can interact with other medications, like blood-thinners. You can also overdose on ivermectin, which can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, hypotension (low blood pressure), allergic reactions (itching and hives), dizziness, ataxia (problems with balance), seizures, coma and even death."
https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/why-you-shoul...
Edit: Grammar and formatting.
The Dr. who reported this is Dr. Jason A. Mcelyea who works at Northeastern Health System Sequoyah in Sallisaw, OK.
They have 6 ER beds.
https://dailycaller.com/2021/09/05/hospital-blows-holes-roll...
American institutions have completely lost the trust of the lesser-educated demographic, are oblivious to this phenomenon, and sneer at those who distrust them instead of trying to be conscious of it and correct it.
Something rotten is making livestock paste look a lot better to these people than taking a chance in a well-reputed doctor's office. What is driving the rural, poorly educated American to buy livestock medicine from the tractor supply store instead of going to the doctor? Let's put it this way, why do you and I go to the doctor? Would we still go there if we found the messengers of consensus, evidence-based medicine were saying and doing things we found untrustworthy or even worthy of moral condemnation?
Speaking on anecdotal experience of having grown up in rural America, you don't really ever admit you're afraid of anything, especially going to the doctor. Instead, you cover it up with anger, denial, and magical thinking. I used to think "essential oils" and the like were people genuinely falling victim to naturalistic fallacy but then ivermectin for COVID-19 happened. The name "ivermectin" doesn't really sound natural to me. It still sounds "medicine-y". But it's coming from a place you find more reputable than a doctor.
I think these people are shit scared to go to the doctor because they don't trust anything anyone on the TV tells them anymore. And why would that happen? Not necessarily that they're doing anything wrong, but they're tone deaf to this demographic, oblivious on how to communicate effectively to them. Call it an effect of class divide, perhaps.
So finally, they turn to people that, astoundingly, seem more trustworthy: far right figures on social media, naturopathic woo, you name it. Maybe they talk differently. Maybe they use themes and culture familiar to them. Or maybe they just don't straight up demean them like segments of the news media are wont to do.
If we fix a communication gap that potentially exists, how many more lives could we save instead of laughing and sneering at people confounded enough to choose horse dewormer over a well-tested vaccine?
It started with Trump denying Covid was a threat because it'd tank the economy to take precautions against it before the elections. Of course it blew up anyway. So all the right wing media and pundits denied it was a danger.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NAh4uS4f78o
It's way easier to spread misinformation to gullible people than it is to counter it. The HCQ mania started with Fox News hosts misinterpreting studies and then telling Trump that it was a magic cure, the govt scientists were not in the loop. So when scientists tell the truth, suddenly it's their fault somehow.
The party of personal responsibility should own up and stop blaming others for Republicans' propensity to fall for political and social media BS.
Uses some very non-factual examples, but the general gist is good IMHO. Responding to a non factual article with more nonsense makes sense to me.
Implying it is for livestock exclusively fuels misinformation on the internet. Someone who actually genuinely needs ivermectin might not take it because of these lies.
[1] https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/ivermectin-covid-19-a...
https://www.merck.com/research-and-products/products-list/
Ivermectin is also available in other forms such as a paste for veterinary use in horses and other animals. (I am not recommending anyone take veterinary medicine.)
The people in hospital are not taking Ivermectin as prescribed by a physician. They're buying horse dewormer and dosing themselves.
It's ridiculous to treat them as the same thing. I truly cannot believe you are incapable of seeing the difference.
Please don't strawman. I never made a claim to the contrary in the parent comment. Debate in good faith or what's the point?
I’ve seen a lot of people doing this “gotcha” correction regarding its use for humans, which while true, doesn’t change the fact we have a bunch of people taking horse medicine.
It is something that can easily be taken wrong (given it has interactions with other meds), that's why people should take it under the direction of a doctor.