In 2017, I interviewed with Elizabeth Holmes to be Head of Finance at Theranos
twitter.com
twitter.com
Sounds like they were keen enough to lean on two respected connections to snag this guy. And he himself wonders why they'd want someone so green to be CFO.
Is this some elaborate psychopathic humblebrag? Did he have some other connection that would be useful? The other two things they mention are big money and high level hires so it would seem it's not desperation, which is how it would have read if they didn't mention those things.
So was he being set up to take the blame? How would that even work at that late stage.
My old boss would sometimes get bizarre ideas into his head and be hell-bent on executing them. Sometimes he would, for no good reason, love a junior interview candidate, call meetings, try to bend the company structure around them ("what if we made him head of X, then move Joe Blogs to run a new team of Y..."). He'd normally find no enthusiasm for them with anyone else in the firm, and drop them eventually, but not without droning on about them for weeks. Or complaining how his lieutenants have no imagination and business flair.
Other vanity projects included:
- Buying 2 (main and redundant) GPS clocks to make sure the office is on correct time. Can't trust this internet time nonsense.
- Hiring clearly useless academics to do projects with no connection to anything we did, just to name-drop. Once he hired a guy who used to map food chains in wetland ecosystems to do some unspecified work, in the field of finance.
- Writing numerous, lengthy, and clearly bonkers fake (positive) reviews for his favourite cafe (I think he had some stake in it too potentially). The kind that sound like members of a sect reviewing their guru.
Other examples have thankfully now been garbage-collected in my head.
So, after this therapeutic rant, it doesn't surprise me at all that Holmes suddenly went after some business school grad. Maybe one of the professors mentioned in passing that it's an excellent guy, or that he wrote a great essay or sth, and she would have made it somehow a point of honor to get him on board. Could be a fake story of course, but wouldn't surprise me if now.
We was evaluating a new technology to replace the old one that had some problems and he told me: "You don't need to use brain to take this decision, you just need to listen your soul".
He also sometimes come out with crazy ideas and CTO need to spend days to convince him about craziness.
No idea what fraction of her words are truth, but it's sad that such charisma is only used to build a fraudulent product in the end, instead of making the world a better place.
I'm not sure if we're left having just washed a lot of time and money, or if it's worse and investors have been scared away still. Whatever the case, one thing it is is sad.
She really is a sociopath but what is fascinating is how she uses her own vulnerabilities to exploit others. This is beyond masterful.
Also: beware of compliments.