Even the average radiologist is high variable, not to mention inter-reader variability.
Under-rated comment here. The question is not whether some AI beats experts, even though the conclusion of this paper is clearly that the state-of-the-art AI does in fact beat them, but whether they are going to beat the radiologist at the free clinic in some poorly-served place.
The US healthcare system has little correlation between price and care quality. More expensive providers don't reliably delivery better patient outcomes.