>that Facebook and Twitter should not be forced to support insurrection and violence masquerading as free speech.
Where is "force" coming into this other than various government demands and threats?
Where is "force" coming into this other than various government demands and threats?
This entire debate is about making private networks such as Facebook into "public/government spaces", thus meaning the Bill Of Rights would apply to a private company (an outrageously anti-Constitutional concept) and it would count as government censorship for Twitter to ban an insurrectionist like Trump.
And with this radically anti-Free Speech conservative supreme court majority, you better believe that the rights of private networks to publish content free from government interference is still high risk.